Do players that admit and apologize to using HGH or steroids better off?
July 30th, 2009
As we see, Bonds and Clemens have never admitted to using HGH or steroids and we all despise them. They are all hiding from the media, denying their use of HGH or steroids, and being jerks about it. But then we have Andy Pettitte, who now I accept his apologize after he admitted to using HGH. Are players better off for admitting their use of HGH or steroids and apologizing for it?
DEFINITELY!
They get it off their chest. They don’t have to worry about being chased and questioned about it all the time. It’ll probably help on the field too since the player doesn’t have to worry about those thing.
Other articles you might like;
yeah like giambi
References :
Yes, they definitely are.
References :
I’de have to agree McGwire, and Bonds both used steroids and aren’t admiting it, and we hate both those guys, but the guys who apologize are better off like Pettite.
References :
yeah, because it totally clears up any (*) by the home run record when Barry Bonds goes into the Hall of Fame. They can’t do it to everyone that is on the list. Or that must start all over from 1984???
References :
No well admitting to use it is the same as apologizing for it. They always see I’m am sorry for using steroids so they are admitting it and apologizing at the same time. You never hear a person say I am not sorry for using steroids, I did it to get better and have a unfair adventage on everyone else.
References :
Those who apologize & admit it are way better off in the eyes of the public.
References :
DEFINITELY!
They get it off their chest. They don’t have to worry about being chased and questioned about it all the time. It’ll probably help on the field too since the player doesn’t have to worry about those thing.
References :
Yes. Honesty is the best policy. Besides, all of the pressure from the media and the public can’t be any fun. Admit it, and it will go away faster.
References :